True Story (for you armchair lawyers)
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
True Story (for you armchair lawyers)
True story...
On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a 10-story building intending to commit suicide. He had left a note to the effect indicating his despondency.
As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.
The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus.
When one intends to kill subject 'A' but kills subject 'B' in the attempt, is one guilty of the murder of subject 'B'?
When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was not loaded. The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her.
Therefore, the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, assuming the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about 6 weeks prior to the fatal accident. It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now for the exquisite twist...
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus!
You see, Ronald had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the 10 story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window.
The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a 10-story building intending to commit suicide. He had left a note to the effect indicating his despondency.
As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.
The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus.
When one intends to kill subject 'A' but kills subject 'B' in the attempt, is one guilty of the murder of subject 'B'?
When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was not loaded. The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her.
Therefore, the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, assuming the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about 6 weeks prior to the fatal accident. It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now for the exquisite twist...
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus!
You see, Ronald had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the 10 story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window.
The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
Guest- Guest
Re: True Story (for you armchair lawyers)
So, if the 10 story building had been a certain hotel, the guy wouldn't have been a murderer, but he did spend the night at a Holiday Inn Express?
Guest- Guest
Re: True Story (for you armchair lawyers)
Now thats one bizarre story Blue..........
Only in Pennsylvania...........right?....
Only in Pennsylvania...........right?....
wood20ks- Does a Bear shit in the Woods?
- Number of posts : 1311
Age : 61
Location : Sterling,Il
Registration date : 2006-08-27
Re: True Story (for you armchair lawyers)
Besides..........The old man should be arrested for some kind of negligence......
Theres no way you get out of pointing a gun at anyone.........Even if it isn`t loaded.........Remember that Magic........
Theres no way you get out of pointing a gun at anyone.........Even if it isn`t loaded.........Remember that Magic........
wood20ks- Does a Bear shit in the Woods?
- Number of posts : 1311
Age : 61
Location : Sterling,Il
Registration date : 2006-08-27
Re: True Story (for you armchair lawyers)
wood20ks wrote:Besides..........The old man should be arrested for some kind of negligence......
Theres no way you get out of pointing a gun at anyone.........Even if it isn`t loaded.........Remember that Magic........
That must be why I can't fly with the Desert Eagle on me.......that is about the only time I am in a hotel (Indy) and just my luck some guy would fall out of a window as I was cleaning the gun
But here at home you really have to be trespassing to get all the way to my house so ...........BOOM ooops!
Bookie Challenge
Original Rookie of the Year
BC CHAMPION 2018
BC CHAMPION 2019
BC CHAMPION 2024
Many time Rudy Award Winner
Bookie Challenge Hall of Fame
https://tinyurl.com/OfficialBookieChallenge
https://tinyurl.com/Official-Bookie-Challenge
Similar topics
» How True!!!!!!!
» The 7th Annual Bookie Challenge
» THANK YOU SD AND GB......True Perfecta?
» Sadly, it's true for most of us
» Give me a True Perfecta
» The 7th Annual Bookie Challenge
» THANK YOU SD AND GB......True Perfecta?
» Sadly, it's true for most of us
» Give me a True Perfecta
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum